Job sources: Remotive, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, official LinkedIn

Navin Career does not rent a job inbox. It follows a fixed order: official API, public ATS board, country portal, web snippet last. LinkedIn is never scraped.

Product: /career. Agent guide: first article.

Live ingested feeds

The first successful ATS board per company wins. No three wasted calls.

LinkedIn: a tab, not a scrape

LinkedIn has no honest public API to list your feed. Navin:

1. Opens the official page in a tab.
2. Accepts a paste of the offer you already read.
3. Refuses every Easy Apply bot.

See /compare/linkedin-easy-apply and apply without a bot.

Portal catalog

Every source has a path:

• api: Remotive, ATS JSON
• portal: official page to open
• paste: LinkedIn and copied offers
• search: web snippet, not an invented dump

Empty search is honest if Remotive or an ATS slug is down.

Sources FAQ

Is Remotive enough?

For public remote, often. ATS boards add internal desks (Stripe, Databricks, Spotify...).

What if the ATS board is empty?

The desk tries the next one. It does not invent a "Senior Engineer" card to look busy.

Is an aggregator simpler?

Simpler to rent. Less honest about origin. See /compare/indeed.

Download · ATS jobs AI · Job agent

Frequent mistakes

• Treating a web snippet as a structured offer.
• Mixing a LinkedIn bot with an "official source".
• Forcing three ATS calls for the same slug.
• Forgetting LinkedIn = tab plus paste.

Internal links

• Agent: Navin Career
• Dossier: CV and pipeline
• Landings: /ats-job-boards-ai · /remote-jobs-gcc-ai
• Vs: /compare/indeed · /compare/linkedin-easy-apply

Deeper: reading a search result

Every card should show:

• real title and company
• source (Remotive, Greenhouse, portal, paste)
• official URL
• country / remote if known

If the source is search, it is not ATS JSON. Open the page before you apply.

Conclusion

Official sources exist. Navin reads them. It does not invent the rest. It does not scrape LinkedIn.

Download Navin · Career · Docs